Aers 2000 and Langland, Wyclif, and the Late Medieval Church (Fall 2010): Difference between pages

From Whiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== John Wyclif's Understanding of Christian Discipleship == '''Wyclif''': all followers should be disciples of Christ, not just priests/friars/monks; maintains a '''split betwee…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== John Wyclif's Understanding of Christian Discipleship ==
:[[Aers 2000|Aers, David. ''Faith, Ethics and Church: Writing in England, 1360-1409.'' Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer, 2000.]]


'''Wyclif''': all followers should be disciples of Christ, not just priests/friars/monks; maintains a '''split between Church and Scripture'''
:[[Aers 2004|Aers, David. ''Sanctifying Signs: Making Christian Tradition in Late Medieval England.'' Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.]]
* through reason we can grasp Scripture's special logic (122)


'''Thomas Netter''' argues against this; says Scripture is not only source of divine law, Holy Church has canonized law, too -- splitting Scripture from Church is like severing limbs from a whole body, splitting bridegroom from bride
:[[Aquinas, Summa Theologica|Aquinas, Thomas. ''Summa Theologica.'']]
* Christ is head of Holy Church, which gives life to the limbs;
* how can we believe Christ (the head) if we reject the Church of Christ (the body)? (121)
* draws on Augustine, who says there can be no authoritative canon or hermeneutics without the authority of the Church (121)


for Wyclif, Jesus' form of life:
:[[Augustine, Confessions|Augustine. ''Confessions.'']]
:"Jesus lived as the most materially estitute of people; and although he enjoyed the universal dominion by grace bestowed on the predestinate, he utterly renounced civil dominion, temporal proprietorship, and worldly violence, violence inextricably bound up by the exercise of civil dominion." (122)


'''precepts''': laid out by Christ as necessary conditions for salvation; '''counsels''': for those that want to do better than just follow the bare minimum
:[[Duffy 2005|Duffy, Eamon. ''Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c.1400-c.1580.'' 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.]]
* Wyclif believed this distinction had no basis in Scripture (126)


at times seems to point towards a '''priesthood of all believers'''; but this concept was developed more fully by his later followers than by him (128)
:[[Langland, Piers Plowman (C-text)]]
* he acknowledges that an order of priesthood is founded in Scripture (129)
* we must all follow Christ's path, Wyclif says, but priests are obligated i na more binding way (130)


leading cleric, the pop, is the vicar of Christ, should follow Christ's form of life; leading jlayman, the king, is vicar of God
:[[Preaching in the Age of Chaucer|''Preaching in the Age of Chaucer: Selected Sermons in Translation.'' Trans. Siegfried Wenzel. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.]]
* pope should be nonviolent, but king must be violent to maintain God's order
 
* Mother Church must have secular lords to defnd her
:[[Salter 1962|Salter, Elizabeth. ''Piers Plowman: An Introduction.'' Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.]]
* "so those Christians who particpate in secular power do not, after all, have to follow the path of Jesus" (130)
 
== Historical background ==
 
'''Investiture Controversy''': conflict between Church and states in c11, c12; popes challenged the authority of monarchs to control appointments (investitures) of church officials (bishops, abbots); ended by '''Concordant of Worms''' (1122), which was kernel of what would become Treaty of Westphalia, confirming sovereignty of nation-states -- Kings given right ("by lance") to grant secular power to church officials, pope retained right ("by ring and by staff") to grant sacred authority
 
'''Good Parliament''' (1376): longest sitting parliament up to that time; sincere efforts to reform government, hindered by '''John of Gaunt''' (third son of Edward III, protector of Wycliffe)
 
'''Western Schism''' (1378-1417): two men claim to be the true pope; political rather than theological differences
 
'''Peasants' Revolt''' (1381): Wat Tyler's Rebellion; public execution of Archbishop of Canterbury; Wycliffe doesn't defend, but does say if you disendow the church, the gov't wouldn't have to pay taxes and the population would be more settled/satisfied
 
== Lollardy & John Wycliffe (1324-1384) ==
 
man in a state of sin has no claim upon government; King, though, is has divine right and therefore should remove corrupt clergy (who is then a traitor to the king) -- if he doesn't, he's remiss in his duties
 
King must accord his laws with God's laws; King should have theologians in his entourage to advise him
 
sin to oppose the power of the kind, which comes directly from God
 
''predestination'': "invisible" church of the elect, vs. "visible" church of Rome
 
Church should be poor, as in the days of the apostles
 
state has right to confiscate temporal holdings of corrupt church officials
* John Gaunt was Wycliffe's protector; served his purposes, as he wanted to confiscate land
 
office of the Pope comes to be equal with the Antichrist in Wycliffe's writings; a Pope is tolerable if he is one of God's elect, but if not he becomes an Antichrist
 
at first, Wycliffe was supported by mendicant monks; then he began calling for their dissolution, forcing many of them to manual labor
 
translated (or oversaw translations) of portions of the Bible into English; opponents: "The jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity."
 
wanted to do away with priestly hierarchy , return to priests being poor with no formal vows; itinerant preachers went two-by-two, in long dark red robes carrying a staff -- called '''Lollards'''
 
Wycliffe is shamelessly attached to royal power; happy to be king's priest -- happy for the crown to appoint the priests
* makes him good model for English Reformation
 
John Van Engen, ''Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life''
 
schedule of questions by English Bishop asked to suspected Wycliffites:
* Have you harbored hereticks?
* Are the images in the church more than stocks and stones?
* Is there any holiday but Sunday? May man work on Sunday?
* Does the priest have the power to save a man's soul? What is the power of a priest?
* What does you shall worship no false gods mean to you? Should men set candles before
 
images?
* How do you feel about pilgrimage? (Wycliffites wouldn't have liked) How do you feel about
 
purgatory? (Wycliffites didn't believe they existed)
 
'''issue of disendowment'''
 
presses hard on lay elites to disendow the church; if you don't, you're betraying the will of God  
 
-- attacking the liberty of the church
 
when Pope Gregory first condemns Wycliffe as a heretic in 1377, they don't take his criticisms
 
as fraternal charity (justified reformation attempts) but as heresy
 
sword is in the hand fo the laity; spiritual sword in the hands of the monks
* if the laity act, it won't be hard to enact a reformation
* same strategy as Henry VIII
 
Lollard Disendowment Bill (1406-7) -- wanted to plunder the church to socialize its holdings,
 
build universities, hospitals
 
benefits treated in medieval law like property -- priest is property of local landlord of the
 
manor, who nominated him; yet supposed to be spiritual representative, arm of the Church
 
friars argue there are good theological reasons to think Church's hold on land is
 
contingent/subordinate to the needs of the crown
 
long history of disendowment  before Wycliffe
 
'''purgatory''':
 
"Prick of the Conscience" -- popular text, long section on pains of purgatory;
"Ghost of Guy" -- medieval text, complaining about how living are not caring for the souls of the
 
dead;
 
purgatory is for the saved -- living have to look after them
 
1395, 12 Lollard Conclusions; nailed them on the doors of Parliament and St. Paul's
 
Thomas Netter, massive critic of Wycliffe and Wycliffite writings; work was printed in counter-Reformation and used against Calvinism
 
'''question of poverty''':
Thomistic writings: difference between a state of perfection and individual holiness; if you're
 
wealthy, what matters is the will -- rich man could be more free from attachment to wealth
 
than an angry poor man might be
 
thinking about virtue and vice is condition of the _will_: not just actions but from the will behind the actions
 
priesthood of all believers; women priests are possibel
 
''Heresy Trials in the Diocese of Norwich, 1428-31''
 
no police, no standing army; only found out as heretic if neighbors report you
 
== Conscience and Synderesis ==
 
SEP, "Medieval Theories of Conscience" [[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conscience-medieval/]]
 
Phillip the Chancellor's treatise on conscience
 
'''voluntaristic view''': Bonaventure
 
'''intellectualistic view''': Aquinas
 
Bonaventure: conscience within the rational faculty, synderesis in affective part of the human stimulating us to do good; two parts to conscience:
* power for discovering truth of general principles ("Obey God!"); innate and unerring
* application of principles to situations; can be misapplied
* ''dynamic faculty''
 
for Bonaventure, synderesis is the "spark of conscience" -- motor motivating us to act on what conscience knows, and which directs synderesis
 
Aquinas: conscience is "the application of knowledge to activity"; synderesis is the natural disposition of the human mind to apprehend the basic principles of behavior, with secondary principles derived from experience; weakness of the will -- will as a passive potency that follows the judgments of the intellect; someone may "know" what he has to do, but is driven otherwise by passion
 
conscience linked with practical knowledge; not necessarily conceived of as a faculty

Latest revision as of 20:27, 18 October 2010

Aers, David. Faith, Ethics and Church: Writing in England, 1360-1409. Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer, 2000.
Aers, David. Sanctifying Signs: Making Christian Tradition in Late Medieval England. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica.
Augustine. Confessions.
Duffy, Eamon. Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c.1400-c.1580. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
Langland, Piers Plowman (C-text)
Preaching in the Age of Chaucer: Selected Sermons in Translation. Trans. Siegfried Wenzel. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.
Salter, Elizabeth. Piers Plowman: An Introduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.

Historical background

Investiture Controversy: conflict between Church and states in c11, c12; popes challenged the authority of monarchs to control appointments (investitures) of church officials (bishops, abbots); ended by Concordant of Worms (1122), which was kernel of what would become Treaty of Westphalia, confirming sovereignty of nation-states -- Kings given right ("by lance") to grant secular power to church officials, pope retained right ("by ring and by staff") to grant sacred authority

Good Parliament (1376): longest sitting parliament up to that time; sincere efforts to reform government, hindered by John of Gaunt (third son of Edward III, protector of Wycliffe)

Western Schism (1378-1417): two men claim to be the true pope; political rather than theological differences

Peasants' Revolt (1381): Wat Tyler's Rebellion; public execution of Archbishop of Canterbury; Wycliffe doesn't defend, but does say if you disendow the church, the gov't wouldn't have to pay taxes and the population would be more settled/satisfied

Lollardy & John Wycliffe (1324-1384)

man in a state of sin has no claim upon government; King, though, is has divine right and therefore should remove corrupt clergy (who is then a traitor to the king) -- if he doesn't, he's remiss in his duties

King must accord his laws with God's laws; King should have theologians in his entourage to advise him

sin to oppose the power of the kind, which comes directly from God

predestination: "invisible" church of the elect, vs. "visible" church of Rome

Church should be poor, as in the days of the apostles

state has right to confiscate temporal holdings of corrupt church officials

  • John Gaunt was Wycliffe's protector; served his purposes, as he wanted to confiscate land

office of the Pope comes to be equal with the Antichrist in Wycliffe's writings; a Pope is tolerable if he is one of God's elect, but if not he becomes an Antichrist

at first, Wycliffe was supported by mendicant monks; then he began calling for their dissolution, forcing many of them to manual labor

translated (or oversaw translations) of portions of the Bible into English; opponents: "The jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity."

wanted to do away with priestly hierarchy , return to priests being poor with no formal vows; itinerant preachers went two-by-two, in long dark red robes carrying a staff -- called Lollards

Wycliffe is shamelessly attached to royal power; happy to be king's priest -- happy for the crown to appoint the priests

  • makes him good model for English Reformation

John Van Engen, Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life

schedule of questions by English Bishop asked to suspected Wycliffites:

  • Have you harbored hereticks?
  • Are the images in the church more than stocks and stones?
  • Is there any holiday but Sunday? May man work on Sunday?
  • Does the priest have the power to save a man's soul? What is the power of a priest?
  • What does you shall worship no false gods mean to you? Should men set candles before

images?

  • How do you feel about pilgrimage? (Wycliffites wouldn't have liked) How do you feel about

purgatory? (Wycliffites didn't believe they existed)

issue of disendowment

presses hard on lay elites to disendow the church; if you don't, you're betraying the will of God

-- attacking the liberty of the church

when Pope Gregory first condemns Wycliffe as a heretic in 1377, they don't take his criticisms

as fraternal charity (justified reformation attempts) but as heresy

sword is in the hand fo the laity; spiritual sword in the hands of the monks

  • if the laity act, it won't be hard to enact a reformation
  • same strategy as Henry VIII

Lollard Disendowment Bill (1406-7) -- wanted to plunder the church to socialize its holdings,

build universities, hospitals

benefits treated in medieval law like property -- priest is property of local landlord of the

manor, who nominated him; yet supposed to be spiritual representative, arm of the Church

friars argue there are good theological reasons to think Church's hold on land is

contingent/subordinate to the needs of the crown

long history of disendowment before Wycliffe

purgatory:

"Prick of the Conscience" -- popular text, long section on pains of purgatory; "Ghost of Guy" -- medieval text, complaining about how living are not caring for the souls of the

dead;

purgatory is for the saved -- living have to look after them

1395, 12 Lollard Conclusions; nailed them on the doors of Parliament and St. Paul's

Thomas Netter, massive critic of Wycliffe and Wycliffite writings; work was printed in counter-Reformation and used against Calvinism

question of poverty: Thomistic writings: difference between a state of perfection and individual holiness; if you're

wealthy, what matters is the will -- rich man could be more free from attachment to wealth

than an angry poor man might be

thinking about virtue and vice is condition of the _will_: not just actions but from the will behind the actions

priesthood of all believers; women priests are possibel

Heresy Trials in the Diocese of Norwich, 1428-31

no police, no standing army; only found out as heretic if neighbors report you

Conscience and Synderesis

SEP, "Medieval Theories of Conscience" [[1]]

Phillip the Chancellor's treatise on conscience

voluntaristic view: Bonaventure

intellectualistic view: Aquinas

Bonaventure: conscience within the rational faculty, synderesis in affective part of the human stimulating us to do good; two parts to conscience:

  • power for discovering truth of general principles ("Obey God!"); innate and unerring
  • application of principles to situations; can be misapplied
  • dynamic faculty

for Bonaventure, synderesis is the "spark of conscience" -- motor motivating us to act on what conscience knows, and which directs synderesis

Aquinas: conscience is "the application of knowledge to activity"; synderesis is the natural disposition of the human mind to apprehend the basic principles of behavior, with secondary principles derived from experience; weakness of the will -- will as a passive potency that follows the judgments of the intellect; someone may "know" what he has to do, but is driven otherwise by passion

conscience linked with practical knowledge; not necessarily conceived of as a faculty