Langland, Piers Plowman (C-text) and Langland, Wyclif, and the Late Medieval Church (Fall 2010): Difference between pages

From Whiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'thinking about version of the Church that emerges from Piers Plowman in secondary literature, Wycliffism has status -- stand-in for modern liberalism; brings modern scholars c…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
thinking about version of the Church that emerges from Piers Plowman
:[[Aers 2000|Aers, David. ''Faith, Ethics and Church: Writing in England, 1360-1409.'' Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer, 2000.]]


in secondary literature, Wycliffism has status -- stand-in for modern liberalism; brings modern
:[[Aers 2004|Aers, David. ''Sanctifying Signs: Making Christian Tradition in Late Medieval England.'' Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.]]


scholars closer to what they wished medieval people believed
:[[Aquinas, Summa Theologica|Aquinas, Thomas. ''Summa Theologica.'']]


observing dis/continuities with Langland's own theology
:[[Augustine, Confessions|Augustine. ''Confessions.'']]


interested in listening to versions of Wycliff that get spread outside of Oxford
:[[Duffy 2005|Duffy, Eamon. ''Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c.1400-c.1580.'' 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.]]


some critics think about Langland as uneducated, as a "clever grammar school boy" -- but he
:[[Langland, Piers Plowman (C-text)]]


engages with 14th century theology very seriously
:[[Preaching in the Age of Chaucer|''Preaching in the Age of Chaucer: Selected Sermons in Translation.'' Trans. Siegfried Wenzel. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.]]


question of the Reformation -- how does Langland fit into Eamon's version of the Middle Ages?
:[[Salter 1962|Salter, Elizabeth. ''Piers Plowman: An Introduction.'' Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.]]


what does this say about Duffy's construction of the late medieval Church?
== Historical background ==


*restless* poem; seems opaque, but great deal of dialectical control
'''Investiture Controversy''': conflict between Church and states in c11, c12; popes challenged the authority of monarchs to control appointments (investitures) of church officials (bishops, abbots); ended by '''Concordant of Worms''' (1122), which was kernel of what would become Treaty of Westphalia, confirming sovereignty of nation-states -- Kings given right ("by lance") to grant secular power to church officials, pope retained right ("by ring and by staff") to grant sacred authority


== Prologue ==
'''Good Parliament''' (1376): longest sitting parliament up to that time; sincere efforts to reform government, hindered by '''John of Gaunt''' (third son of Edward III, protector of Wycliffe)


"I've become a problem to myself" -- famous lines from the Confessions
'''Western Schism''' (1378-1417): two men claim to be the true pope; political rather than theological differences


models of the Middle Ages as static and hierarchical; this prologue doesn't know them
'''Peasants' Revolt''' (1381): Wat Tyler's Rebellion; public execution of Archbishop of Canterbury; Wycliffe doesn't defend, but does say if you disendow the church, the gov't wouldn't have to pay taxes and the population would be more settled/satisfied


"Conscience in the Middle Ages"
== Lollardy & John Wycliffe (1324-1384) ==
-- is Piers Plowman's "Conscience" Thomistic?


Andrew Galloway, commentary on Piers Plowman
man in a state of sin has no claim upon government; King, though, is has divine right and therefore should remove corrupt clergy (who is then a traitor to the king) -- if he doesn't, he's remiss in his duties


allegorical figures -- high stylistic of Kynde Wit clashes with final lines, full of ordinary life
King must accord his laws with God's laws; King should have theologians in his entourage to advise him


"fragmentation of the forms of inquiry"; Will is given maps for finding his way -- give the  
sin to oppose the power of the kind, which comes directly from God


possibility of a unified inquiry; how do we go on if the ground we're put on doesn't match the  
''predestination'': "invisible" church of the elect, vs. "visible" church of Rome


maps we're given?
Church should be poor, as in the days of the apostles


when reason can't control us, we have anarchy; we *need* the cat -- all the forces of reform
state has right to confiscate temporal holdings of corrupt church officials
* John Gaunt was Wycliffe's protector; served his purposes, as he wanted to confiscate land


swallowed up in image of human beings who have become mice and rats
office of the Pope comes to be equal with the Antichrist in Wycliffe's writings; a Pope is tolerable if he is one of God's elect, but if not he becomes an Antichrist


put him to pride -- put him to the plow -- concretized images
at first, Wycliffe was supported by mendicant monks; then he began calling for their dissolution, forcing many of them to manual labor


friars: mobile figures; answerable to papacy, not bishops
translated (or oversaw translations) of portions of the Bible into English; opponents: "The jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity."
 
wanted to do away with priestly hierarchy , return to priests being poor with no formal vows; itinerant preachers went two-by-two, in long dark red robes carrying a staff -- called '''Lollards'''
 
Wycliffe is shamelessly attached to royal power; happy to be king's priest -- happy for the crown to appoint the priests
* makes him good model for English Reformation
 
John Van Engen, ''Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life''
 
schedule of questions by English Bishop asked to suspected Wycliffites:
* Have you harbored hereticks?
* Are the images in the church more than stocks and stones?
* Is there any holiday but Sunday? May man work on Sunday?
* Does the priest have the power to save a man's soul? What is the power of a priest?
* What does you shall worship no false gods mean to you? Should men set candles before
 
images?
* How do you feel about pilgrimage? (Wycliffites wouldn't have liked) How do you feel about
 
purgatory? (Wycliffites didn't believe they existed)
 
'''issue of disendowment'''
 
presses hard on lay elites to disendow the church; if you don't, you're betraying the will of God
 
-- attacking the liberty of the church
 
when Pope Gregory first condemns Wycliffe as a heretic in 1377, they don't take his criticisms
 
as fraternal charity (justified reformation attempts) but as heresy
 
sword is in the hand fo the laity; spiritual sword in the hands of the monks
* if the laity act, it won't be hard to enact a reformation
* same strategy as Henry VIII
 
Lollard Disendowment Bill (1406-7) -- wanted to plunder the church to socialize its holdings,
 
build universities, hospitals
 
benefits treated in medieval law like property -- priest is property of local landlord of the
 
manor, who nominated him; yet supposed to be spiritual representative, arm of the Church
 
friars argue there are good theological reasons to think Church's hold on land is
 
contingent/subordinate to the needs of the crown
 
long history of disendowment  before Wycliffe
 
'''purgatory''':
 
"Prick of the Conscience" -- popular text, long section on pains of purgatory;
"Ghost of Guy" -- medieval text, complaining about how living are not caring for the souls of the
 
dead;
 
purgatory is for the saved -- living have to look after them
 
1395, 12 Lollard Conclusions; nailed them on the doors of Parliament and St. Paul's
 
Thomas Netter, massive critic of Wycliffe and Wycliffite writings; work was printed in counter-Reformation and used against Calvinism
 
'''question of poverty''':
Thomistic writings: difference between a state of perfection and individual holiness; if you're
 
wealthy, what matters is the will -- rich man could be more free from attachment to wealth
 
than an angry poor man might be
 
thinking about virtue and vice is condition of the _will_: not just actions but from the will behind the actions
 
priesthood of all believers; women priests are possibel
 
''Heresy Trials in the Diocese of Norwich, 1428-31''
 
no police, no standing army; only found out as heretic if neighbors report you
 
== Conscience and Synderesis ==
 
SEP, "Medieval Theories of Conscience" [[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conscience-medieval/]]
 
Phillip the Chancellor's treatise on conscience
 
'''voluntaristic view''': Bonaventure
 
'''intellectualistic view''': Aquinas
 
Bonaventure: conscience within the rational faculty, synderesis in affective part of the human stimulating us to do good; two parts to conscience:
* power for discovering truth of general principles ("Obey God!"); innate and unerring
* application of principles to situations; can be misapplied
* ''dynamic faculty''
 
for Bonaventure, synderesis is the "spark of conscience" -- motor motivating us to act on what conscience knows, and which directs synderesis
 
Aquinas: conscience is "the application of knowledge to activity"; synderesis is the natural disposition of the human mind to apprehend the basic principles of behavior, with secondary principles derived from experience; weakness of the will -- will as a passive potency that follows the judgments of the intellect; someone may "know" what he has to do, but is driven otherwise by passion
 
conscience linked with practical knowledge; not necessarily conceived of as a faculty

Latest revision as of 20:27, 18 October 2010

Aers, David. Faith, Ethics and Church: Writing in England, 1360-1409. Rochester, NY: D.S. Brewer, 2000.
Aers, David. Sanctifying Signs: Making Christian Tradition in Late Medieval England. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica.
Augustine. Confessions.
Duffy, Eamon. Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c.1400-c.1580. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
Langland, Piers Plowman (C-text)
Preaching in the Age of Chaucer: Selected Sermons in Translation. Trans. Siegfried Wenzel. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.
Salter, Elizabeth. Piers Plowman: An Introduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.

Historical background

Investiture Controversy: conflict between Church and states in c11, c12; popes challenged the authority of monarchs to control appointments (investitures) of church officials (bishops, abbots); ended by Concordant of Worms (1122), which was kernel of what would become Treaty of Westphalia, confirming sovereignty of nation-states -- Kings given right ("by lance") to grant secular power to church officials, pope retained right ("by ring and by staff") to grant sacred authority

Good Parliament (1376): longest sitting parliament up to that time; sincere efforts to reform government, hindered by John of Gaunt (third son of Edward III, protector of Wycliffe)

Western Schism (1378-1417): two men claim to be the true pope; political rather than theological differences

Peasants' Revolt (1381): Wat Tyler's Rebellion; public execution of Archbishop of Canterbury; Wycliffe doesn't defend, but does say if you disendow the church, the gov't wouldn't have to pay taxes and the population would be more settled/satisfied

Lollardy & John Wycliffe (1324-1384)

man in a state of sin has no claim upon government; King, though, is has divine right and therefore should remove corrupt clergy (who is then a traitor to the king) -- if he doesn't, he's remiss in his duties

King must accord his laws with God's laws; King should have theologians in his entourage to advise him

sin to oppose the power of the kind, which comes directly from God

predestination: "invisible" church of the elect, vs. "visible" church of Rome

Church should be poor, as in the days of the apostles

state has right to confiscate temporal holdings of corrupt church officials

  • John Gaunt was Wycliffe's protector; served his purposes, as he wanted to confiscate land

office of the Pope comes to be equal with the Antichrist in Wycliffe's writings; a Pope is tolerable if he is one of God's elect, but if not he becomes an Antichrist

at first, Wycliffe was supported by mendicant monks; then he began calling for their dissolution, forcing many of them to manual labor

translated (or oversaw translations) of portions of the Bible into English; opponents: "The jewel of the clergy has become the toy of the laity."

wanted to do away with priestly hierarchy , return to priests being poor with no formal vows; itinerant preachers went two-by-two, in long dark red robes carrying a staff -- called Lollards

Wycliffe is shamelessly attached to royal power; happy to be king's priest -- happy for the crown to appoint the priests

  • makes him good model for English Reformation

John Van Engen, Sisters and Brothers of the Common Life

schedule of questions by English Bishop asked to suspected Wycliffites:

  • Have you harbored hereticks?
  • Are the images in the church more than stocks and stones?
  • Is there any holiday but Sunday? May man work on Sunday?
  • Does the priest have the power to save a man's soul? What is the power of a priest?
  • What does you shall worship no false gods mean to you? Should men set candles before

images?

  • How do you feel about pilgrimage? (Wycliffites wouldn't have liked) How do you feel about

purgatory? (Wycliffites didn't believe they existed)

issue of disendowment

presses hard on lay elites to disendow the church; if you don't, you're betraying the will of God

-- attacking the liberty of the church

when Pope Gregory first condemns Wycliffe as a heretic in 1377, they don't take his criticisms

as fraternal charity (justified reformation attempts) but as heresy

sword is in the hand fo the laity; spiritual sword in the hands of the monks

  • if the laity act, it won't be hard to enact a reformation
  • same strategy as Henry VIII

Lollard Disendowment Bill (1406-7) -- wanted to plunder the church to socialize its holdings,

build universities, hospitals

benefits treated in medieval law like property -- priest is property of local landlord of the

manor, who nominated him; yet supposed to be spiritual representative, arm of the Church

friars argue there are good theological reasons to think Church's hold on land is

contingent/subordinate to the needs of the crown

long history of disendowment before Wycliffe

purgatory:

"Prick of the Conscience" -- popular text, long section on pains of purgatory; "Ghost of Guy" -- medieval text, complaining about how living are not caring for the souls of the

dead;

purgatory is for the saved -- living have to look after them

1395, 12 Lollard Conclusions; nailed them on the doors of Parliament and St. Paul's

Thomas Netter, massive critic of Wycliffe and Wycliffite writings; work was printed in counter-Reformation and used against Calvinism

question of poverty: Thomistic writings: difference between a state of perfection and individual holiness; if you're

wealthy, what matters is the will -- rich man could be more free from attachment to wealth

than an angry poor man might be

thinking about virtue and vice is condition of the _will_: not just actions but from the will behind the actions

priesthood of all believers; women priests are possibel

Heresy Trials in the Diocese of Norwich, 1428-31

no police, no standing army; only found out as heretic if neighbors report you

Conscience and Synderesis

SEP, "Medieval Theories of Conscience" [[1]]

Phillip the Chancellor's treatise on conscience

voluntaristic view: Bonaventure

intellectualistic view: Aquinas

Bonaventure: conscience within the rational faculty, synderesis in affective part of the human stimulating us to do good; two parts to conscience:

  • power for discovering truth of general principles ("Obey God!"); innate and unerring
  • application of principles to situations; can be misapplied
  • dynamic faculty

for Bonaventure, synderesis is the "spark of conscience" -- motor motivating us to act on what conscience knows, and which directs synderesis

Aquinas: conscience is "the application of knowledge to activity"; synderesis is the natural disposition of the human mind to apprehend the basic principles of behavior, with secondary principles derived from experience; weakness of the will -- will as a passive potency that follows the judgments of the intellect; someone may "know" what he has to do, but is driven otherwise by passion

conscience linked with practical knowledge; not necessarily conceived of as a faculty