Olson 1994

Demythologizing Literacy

assumptions about literacy:

1. "writing is the transcription of speech" (3)
2. "the superiority of writing to speech" (3)
3. "the technological superiority of the alphabetic writing system" (4)
4. "literacy as the organ of social progress" (5)
5. "literacy as an instrument of cultural and scientific development" (6)
6. "literacy as an instrument of cognitive development" (7)

debunks each

"What is required is a theory or set of theories of just how literacy relates to language, mind and culture. No such theory currently exists perhaps because the concepts of both ltieracy and thinking are too general and too vague to bear such theoretical burdens." (13)

overviews earlier theories: Weber, Levy-Bruhl; Toronto School of McLuhan, Havelock, Innis

failure of earlier theories: focus on ways of writing (form of the script); Olson focuses on ways of reading -- problems of interpretation rise from what texts fail to represent; wants to show "how our understanding of the world, that is our science, and our understanding of ourselves, that is, our psychology, are by-products of our ways of interpreting and creating written texts, of living in a world on paper" (19)