Adams and Barker 1993: Difference between revisions

From Whiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Adams, Thomas R. and Nicolas Barker. "A New Model for the Study of the Book." ''A Potencie of Life: Books in Society.'' Ed. Nicolas Barker. London: British Library, 1993. 5-43. …')
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
:"The power of books is not just what strikes the eye, but what may be latent, to be disclosed in the future." (9)
:"The power of books is not just what strikes the eye, but what may be latent, to be disclosed in the future." (9)
* "latent power is vastly magnified by the multiplicity of copies" (9)
* "latent power is vastly magnified by the multiplicity of copies" (9)
bibliographers often too content "to dig their own small patch"; social historians can add much (10)
'''criticisms of Darnton's communication circuit''':
* term "publisher" is anachronistic
* shipper (simply providing a service as he would for any other commodity) not as important as more general lines of communication
* most importantly, ''deals with people rather than books'' (12); focuses on history of communication
* "it ignores the sheer randomness, the speculative uncertainty of the book trade." (12)
term "book" doesn't include broadsides, ephemera, etc.; Adams and Baker propose '''"bibliographical document"''' (13) -- limit is if "the agent's intention involves the process of duplication" (13)

Revision as of 19:20, 28 August 2010

Adams, Thomas R. and Nicolas Barker. "A New Model for the Study of the Book." A Potencie of Life: Books in Society. Ed. Nicolas Barker. London: British Library, 1993. 5-43.

Martin, Febvre, The coming of the book -- began tradition of "the history of the book"

Eisenstein presented a critique of history with Printing Press -- social revolutions caused by printing press, rather than other way around; Darnton, too, focusing on Enlightenment

the bibliographer is thus "unexpectedly dragged into the limelight by academic historians" (6)

bibliography used to occupy same position as archaeology; but now seems doomed always to be a handmiden to other disciplines

quintessentially interdisciplinary

"The power of books is not just what strikes the eye, but what may be latent, to be disclosed in the future." (9)
  • "latent power is vastly magnified by the multiplicity of copies" (9)

bibliographers often too content "to dig their own small patch"; social historians can add much (10)

criticisms of Darnton's communication circuit:

  • term "publisher" is anachronistic
  • shipper (simply providing a service as he would for any other commodity) not as important as more general lines of communication
  • most importantly, deals with people rather than books (12); focuses on history of communication
  • "it ignores the sheer randomness, the speculative uncertainty of the book trade." (12)

term "book" doesn't include broadsides, ephemera, etc.; Adams and Baker propose "bibliographical document" (13) -- limit is if "the agent's intention involves the process of duplication" (13)