Sappol 2006: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ':"Until the invention of X-ray imagin, sonograms, CT scans, MRIs, and the like, the only way to see into ourselves was through the dissection of dead human beings. '''The dissect…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:"Until the invention of X-ray | :"Until the invention of X-ray imaging, sonograms, CT scans, MRIs, and the like, the only way to see into ourselves was through the dissection of dead human beings. '''The dissected cadaver was our mirror.'''" (6) | ||
:"The anatomist was a '''performer'''. Anatomy required showmanship." (6) | :"The anatomist was a '''performer'''. Anatomy required showmanship." (6) | ||
:"Neither Vesalius nor his artists could conceive of, or desire, a work governed entirely by austere naturalism. Quite the contrary, they wanted to entertain their readers and themselves. They responded to a pervasive cultural expectation that governed printed images in early modern Europe: the illustration should be, in some way, delightful, and should tell a story. So when Vesalius entered the scene, things got more scientific, but also wittier and more theatrical." (17) | :"Neither Vesalius nor his artists could conceive of, or desire, a work governed entirely by austere naturalism. Quite the contrary, they wanted to entertain their readers and themselves. They responded to a pervasive cultural expectation that governed printed images in early modern Europe: the illustration should be, in some way, delightful, and should tell a story. So when Vesalius entered the scene, things got more scientific, but also wittier and more theatrical." (17) | ||
Revision as of 21:12, 22 February 2011
- "Until the invention of X-ray imaging, sonograms, CT scans, MRIs, and the like, the only way to see into ourselves was through the dissection of dead human beings. The dissected cadaver was our mirror." (6)
- "The anatomist was a performer. Anatomy required showmanship." (6)
- "Neither Vesalius nor his artists could conceive of, or desire, a work governed entirely by austere naturalism. Quite the contrary, they wanted to entertain their readers and themselves. They responded to a pervasive cultural expectation that governed printed images in early modern Europe: the illustration should be, in some way, delightful, and should tell a story. So when Vesalius entered the scene, things got more scientific, but also wittier and more theatrical." (17)