Johns 2009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* says the body (the trade) forgot/cut off the head (the Crown) (33) | * says the body (the trade) forgot/cut off the head (the Crown) (33) | ||
* likened printing patents to royal land grants -- Crown still owned land, but people oversaw it, kept people from poaching the deer (34) | * likened printing patents to royal land grants -- Crown still owned land, but people oversaw it, kept people from poaching the deer (34) | ||
'''piracy''' |
Revision as of 03:17, 3 December 2010
The Invention of Piracy
- "Precisely when authorship took on a mantle of public authority, through the crafts of the printed book, its violation came to be seen as paramount transgression -- as an offense against the common good akin to the crime of the brigand, bandit, or pirate." (19)
medieval distinction between liberal and mechanical arts
- Renaissance broke down these barriers; craft guilds with intellectual pursuits
pirate: use arose in English Revolution; previously, Donne had referred to antiquarian plagiarists as "wit-pyrats" (1611) (23), but
Stationers' Company:
- SC could come look around printing houses for quality control
- printing literally done in house by regulation -- domestic moral authority; pirated printing was done outside the house, in "holes" or "corners"
- author and reader had no role (27)
Stationers' Register vs. Crown (privileges and patents)
- 1624: Monopolies Act by Parliament; Crown could only issue patents for activities under its authority (like gunpowder) or where no trade already existed in the realm
- thought to mark the origin of Anglo-American intellectual property; but "in context, its real target was this proliferation of Crown intervention in the realm's everyday commercial conduct" (28)
English Civil War
- regulation out the window
- Milton's Areopagitica, Gerrard Winstanley's pamphlets
restored Charles II "therefore viewed popular print with a queasy mixture of respect, unease, and fear" (30); "how to accommodate and exploit what was becoming a perpetual sphere of printed argument, in which the rules of knowledge were no longer those of university, court or palace" (30)
Richard Atkyns: claimed he was heir to lucrative patent on printing common law books, originally granted by Elizabeth I
- SC challenged; some law books were already on the register from the Restoration era
- Atkyns claimed book trade was responsible for Civil War; had to be taken over by gentlemen granted privileges from the crown
- wanted Charles II to take over the printing press as property of the Crown;
- rewrote a history of printing in England, such that it began as "an appendage of royal power" rather than private enterprise (33)
- says the body (the trade) forgot/cut off the head (the Crown) (33)
- likened printing patents to royal land grants -- Crown still owned land, but people oversaw it, kept people from poaching the deer (34)
piracy