Jackson 2001: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Physical Features == | == Physical Features == | ||
''how useful is this kind of typology? doesn't marginalia itself prove the futility of this exercise?'' | |||
''who is the audience for marginalia?'' | |||
Coleridge, symbols used to indicate different states during reading of Blake's ''Songs of Innocence''; to indicate his interpretation of Southey's parts of ''Joan of Arc'' (28-9) | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
Revision as of 02:00, 29 September 2010
Jackson, Heather. Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books. New Haven: Yale University Pres, 2001.
Samuel Johnson's Plan of a Dictionary, University of Toronto's copy -- c18 owner Samuel Maude used it as a diary
- "I am interested in interpretation and in the progress of interpretation, both in the individual reader and in the great society of readers over time. Every record of a particular reader's engagement with a book will have both historical and ahistorical or transhistorical elements. As physical objects, books have changed in shape and texture over the years, but some features remain constant. As intellectual objects, they act upon -- or rather interact with -- the reader's mind in different ways upon different occasions, but again there are constant features: the words on the page do not change, the range of meaning is not wide open." (15)
"curiosity-driven research"
Physical Features
how useful is this kind of typology? doesn't marginalia itself prove the futility of this exercise?
who is the audience for marginalia?
Coleridge, symbols used to indicate different states during reading of Blake's Songs of Innocence; to indicate his interpretation of Southey's parts of Joan of Arc (28-9)