Facsimiles: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
https://collation.folger.edu/2017/07/photographic-facsimile-from-1857/#easy-footnote-2-14226 | https://collation.folger.edu/2017/07/photographic-facsimile-from-1857/#easy-footnote-2-14226 | ||
== Work on EEBO as facsimile project == | |||
=== Ian Gadd, "The Use and Misuse of Early English Books Online," Literature Compass 6/3 (2009): 680-692 === | |||
STC, Pollard and Redgrave, pre-1641 | |||
* Catalogue of editions and issues, not copies | |||
* Catalogue of survivors | |||
* Limited to English language books printed anywhere in the world during this time — so “the very large numbers of foreign-printed Latin books imported into England from the 15c onwards are not to be found in STC, meaning that one cannot read STC’s contents as a full representation of Britain’s print culture prior to 1641” | |||
Wing, by Donald Wing between 1945 and 1951, up to 1700 | |||
* Printed between 1972 and 1998 | |||
* Excludes periodicals and other ephemeral items that STC had catalogued | |||
Eighteenth Century Short Title Catalogue, ESTC, established at British Library in mid-=1970s | |||
* Computerized cataloguing project, made available through published microfiches and CD-ROMs | |||
* Exclude serials, bookplates, trad e cards, playbills, and blank forms or engraved prints, music, or maps | |||
* “Did away entirely with genre-specific information; the organizing unit was solely the individual edition” (684) | |||
1987, incorporate STC and Wing into ESTC to create newly-titled English Short Title Catalogue | |||
* Made available in 1994, CD-ROM published in 1998 and 2003 | |||
* 2006, ESTC made freely available on internet through BL | |||
* “ESTC is a hybrid database consisting of three sets of catalogue records, each constructed on different principles.” (684) | |||
Eugene Power, University Microfilms (now ProQuest), founded in 1938 | |||
* Began copying English books pre-1701, using STC and Wing | |||
* By late 1990s, several thousand reels published in two series, “Early English Books, 1475-1640” and “Early English Books, 1641-1700” | |||
* “Power originally envisaged the microfilming of pre-1701 books as a way of improving the research collections of US university libraries that otherwise had rather limited physical holdings of such books” (685) | |||
* 1998, UM (now ProQuest) began making digitized copies of microfilms available to subscribing institutions, creating EEBO | |||
2003, Thomsn Gale (not Gale Cengage Learning) put Eightenth Century Collection films online, creating ECCO | |||
“By bringing together the bibliographical record for an edition and (usually but not always) only a single witness of that edition,22 EEBO is obviously aiming to provide a useful scholarly mechanism in terms of searching but by doing so are implying – albeit not deliberately – that the record and the copy are one and the same thing.23 It would be better, perhaps, if EEBO represented itself as a library of copies, rather than a catalogue of ‘titles’.” (687) |
Revision as of 20:27, 14 March 2020
https://manuscriptroadtrip.wordpress.com/2014/01/18/manuscript-road-trip-the-spanish-forger/
- The Spanish Forger -- 19/20c making medieval illuminated initials; reusing parchment, sometimes text/image don't relate
https://twitter.com/SocAntiquaries/status/1183774797844623360 "Charles Stothard was commissioned to draw the Bayeux Tapestry for the Society in 1816. During his 3 visits to Bayeux he also made small plaster casts - by taking wax impressions of the linen - to capture the detail of the embroidery. Of course, this would never be allowed today!"
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/preservation/2019/10/18/hidden-hornbooks/
Trajan’s column at v & a: https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/trajans-column
https://collation.folger.edu/2017/07/photographic-facsimile-from-1857/#easy-footnote-2-14226
Work on EEBO as facsimile project
Ian Gadd, "The Use and Misuse of Early English Books Online," Literature Compass 6/3 (2009): 680-692
STC, Pollard and Redgrave, pre-1641
- Catalogue of editions and issues, not copies
- Catalogue of survivors
- Limited to English language books printed anywhere in the world during this time — so “the very large numbers of foreign-printed Latin books imported into England from the 15c onwards are not to be found in STC, meaning that one cannot read STC’s contents as a full representation of Britain’s print culture prior to 1641”
Wing, by Donald Wing between 1945 and 1951, up to 1700
- Printed between 1972 and 1998
- Excludes periodicals and other ephemeral items that STC had catalogued
Eighteenth Century Short Title Catalogue, ESTC, established at British Library in mid-=1970s
- Computerized cataloguing project, made available through published microfiches and CD-ROMs
- Exclude serials, bookplates, trad e cards, playbills, and blank forms or engraved prints, music, or maps
- “Did away entirely with genre-specific information; the organizing unit was solely the individual edition” (684)
1987, incorporate STC and Wing into ESTC to create newly-titled English Short Title Catalogue
- Made available in 1994, CD-ROM published in 1998 and 2003
- 2006, ESTC made freely available on internet through BL
- “ESTC is a hybrid database consisting of three sets of catalogue records, each constructed on different principles.” (684)
Eugene Power, University Microfilms (now ProQuest), founded in 1938
- Began copying English books pre-1701, using STC and Wing
- By late 1990s, several thousand reels published in two series, “Early English Books, 1475-1640” and “Early English Books, 1641-1700”
- “Power originally envisaged the microfilming of pre-1701 books as a way of improving the research collections of US university libraries that otherwise had rather limited physical holdings of such books” (685)
- 1998, UM (now ProQuest) began making digitized copies of microfilms available to subscribing institutions, creating EEBO
2003, Thomsn Gale (not Gale Cengage Learning) put Eightenth Century Collection films online, creating ECCO
“By bringing together the bibliographical record for an edition and (usually but not always) only a single witness of that edition,22 EEBO is obviously aiming to provide a useful scholarly mechanism in terms of searching but by doing so are implying – albeit not deliberately – that the record and the copy are one and the same thing.23 It would be better, perhaps, if EEBO represented itself as a library of copies, rather than a catalogue of ‘titles’.” (687)