<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Humphrey_Moseley</id>
	<title>Humphrey Moseley - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Humphrey_Moseley"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Humphrey_Moseley&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-29T15:11:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Humphrey_Moseley&amp;diff=4157&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wtrettien: Created page with &quot;bookscape -- Raven 2014  == David Gants, &quot;A Quantitative Analysis of the London Book Trade 1614-1618,&quot; Studies in Bibliography 55 (2002): 185-213. ==  examining &quot;a period...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Humphrey_Moseley&amp;diff=4157&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2018-05-24T12:56:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;bookscape -- &lt;a href=&quot;/whiki/index.php/Raven_2014&quot; title=&quot;Raven 2014&quot;&gt;Raven 2014&lt;/a&gt;  == David Gants, &amp;quot;A Quantitative Analysis of the London Book Trade 1614-1618,&amp;quot; Studies in Bibliography 55 (2002): 185-213. ==  examining &amp;quot;a period...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;bookscape -- [[Raven 2014]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== David Gants, &amp;quot;A Quantitative Analysis of the London Book Trade 1614-1618,&amp;quot; Studies in Bibliography 55 (2002): 185-213. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
examining &amp;quot;a period when the city enjoyed relative peace and prosperity&amp;quot; (185)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
using edition sheets to count output&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
during the period, London stationers produced &amp;quot;an average of 7616 edition sheets and 356 distinct editions each year&amp;quot; (186); size of a typical book was &amp;quot;slightly less than 22 edition sheets&amp;quot; (187)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
over half of that output was religious material; 15% works of literature, 12% informational texts, 11% law and politics, 7% history, 2% ephemera and official documents&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
first 40 years of 17c, number of master printers in London hovered around 20 (see [[Raven 2014]] also), limited to 1-2 presses each&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
about 29 individuals or organizations appear on title pages; top 6 offices responsible for over half the output, sustaining the high volume through privileges to print bestselling materials or by cultivating relationships with publishers who provided sufficient work&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;the data suggest a strong correlation between the ability of a printer to solicit commissions from other publishers and the production totals posted by that printer&amp;quot; (193)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
handful of productive printers responsible for almost half of output; patents play a big role, use of patents was greatly expanded by Queen Elizabeth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
by James, patents divided into stocks: English Stock, Latin Stock, King's Printer material, and Ballad partners&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Overall, the effect of these patents was to channel certain classes of books to a select group of stationers&amp;quot; (204)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
King's Printer: first hundred years of printing in England, royal publishing was on a contractual/commission basis; but in 1577, Christopher Barker was awarded the post of Kings Printer, it became recotnized as a distinct office with publication rights. Barker bought Bacon House in 1579, effectively leading to the concept of a royal printing house under joint ownership; patents for control of printing large- and small-format Bibles, some prayer-books, certain classes of official documents, but Bibles took the most time/resources&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
King's Printer accounded for 6069 edition sheets or 17% of all London printing from 1614-18, over half of that devoded to Bibles of Books of Common Prayer, 3/4 reprints&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
observations: &amp;quot;the most productive printing houses maintained their high levels of activity either through the acquisition of protected titles or by aggressively pursuing work as trade printers; religious works constituted the single most important area of publishing, and a large number of stationers were involved in producing the non-protected segment of the field, especially sermons and books of religious devotion and instruction; literary and informational titles were also an important segment of non-protected printing, with perhaps two-thirds of the stationers we can identify as publishers involved with this trade; other areas, such as history and works of religious commentary and controversy attracted relatively few stationers interested in publishing; different subjects bring with them certain expectations regarding format, especially volumes of history, law, and works of religious commentary and controversy.&amp;quot; (212)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wtrettien</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>