<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Greetham_1994</id>
	<title>Greetham 1994 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Greetham_1994"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-29T16:16:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;diff=3070&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wtrettien: Created page with &quot;Greetham, D. C. ''Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.'' New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.  two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textu...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;diff=3070&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-04-21T21:01:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Greetham, D. C. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.  two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textu...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Greetham, D. C. ''Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.'' New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textual criticism and subject fields (like literature) are related (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Editing depends upon textual scholarship, but textual scholarship is not merely method or technique; it is judgment and criticism, evaluation and discrimination, encompassing historical and cultural learning as well.&amp;quot; (5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''enumerative or systematic bibliography'': listing of books; refers to manuscript and printed materials&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''codicology'': the study of manuscripts as artifacts (6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''papyrology'': the study of papyrus materials&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''diplomatics'': examination of the writing on legal documents&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''paleography'': the examination of handwriting; some overlap with codicology when study of the manuscript itself is included&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''epigraphy'': inscribed writing on monuments&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''numismatics'': writing on a coin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''ostraka'': scraps and shards of pots&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''analytical bibliographhy'' or ''new bibliography'': study of the process for printing texts; considered a &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; reaction to the older enumerative book-colletor's bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''historical bibliography'' (sometimes the &amp;quot;biology of books&amp;quot;): studying books as part of a Darwinian evolution of a manufactring process&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''descriptive bibliography'': using info gained in analytical and historical bibliography to prepare an account of the bibiographical nature of the book -- addressing the &amp;quot;ideal copy&amp;quot;, listing contents, format, collation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''ideal copy'': that version intended for release by the printer, after all determined corrections have been made&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''textual bibliography'': employment of technical info derived from analytical or descriptive bibliography in charting and evalutating the effect of the technical history on the text itself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
paleography, codicology, analytical and descriptive bibliography as a prelud to the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; business of textual scholarship: &amp;quot;the reconstruction of an author's intended text and/or the production of a critical edition displaying this intention or some other version of the text&amp;quot; (8); sometimes called &amp;quot;textual criticism&amp;quot; in classics, biblical studies, medieval studies -- sometimes also called &amp;quot;Lower Criticism&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''recension'': arranging manuscripts according to relative authority, using the genealogical system of ''stemmatics'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''textual analysis'': similar process of determining textual descent among printed texts, hcharting error and variance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
next step is emendation, through ''textual'' or ''scholarly editing''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
differentiated sometimes from ''documentary editing'': editing involving single rather than multiple documents; associated with historical rather than literary editions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''New Scholarship'': practitioners claim that eclectic or critical editing's concentration on &amp;quot;final intention&amp;quot; is a chimera; better to describe process rather than product of literary composition; often in debate with ''social textual criticism'', denies priority given to author's intentions and sees textual creation as a collaborative, social act, but both ''New Scholarship'' and ''social textual criticism'' is part of the general movement of ''revisionism''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
textual scholarship part of larger field of ''philology'', defined under 19c German auspices (Altertumswissenschaft, &amp;quot;the science of ancient times&amp;quot;) as the study of historical perspective, seeing a past culture and trying to re-create its ethos; morphed into ''historical linguistics'' (diachronic methods, as opposed to ''structuralist linguistics'', synchronic methods)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
even more generally, part of ''historical criticism'' as opposed to close critical analysis&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wtrettien</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>