<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Greetham_1994</id>
	<title>Greetham 1994 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Greetham_1994"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-16T06:17:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;diff=3070&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Wtrettien: Created page with &quot;Greetham, D. C. &#039;&#039;Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.&#039;&#039; New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.  two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textu...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whitneyannetrettien.com/whiki/index.php?title=Greetham_1994&amp;diff=3070&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-04-21T21:01:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Greetham, D. C. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.  two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textu...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Greetham, D. C. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Textual Scholarship: An Introduction.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; New York: Garland Publishing, 1994.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
two basic principles in book: 1) textual studies has a historical bias; 2) textual criticism and subject fields (like literature) are related (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Editing depends upon textual scholarship, but textual scholarship is not merely method or technique; it is judgment and criticism, evaluation and discrimination, encompassing historical and cultural learning as well.&amp;quot; (5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;enumerative or systematic bibliography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: listing of books; refers to manuscript and printed materials&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;codicology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the study of manuscripts as artifacts (6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;papyrology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the study of papyrus materials&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;diplomatics&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: examination of the writing on legal documents&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;paleography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the examination of handwriting; some overlap with codicology when study of the manuscript itself is included&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;epigraphy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: inscribed writing on monuments&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;numismatics&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: writing on a coin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ostraka&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: scraps and shards of pots&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;analytical bibliographhy&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;new bibliography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: study of the process for printing texts; considered a &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; reaction to the older enumerative book-colletor&amp;#039;s bibliography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;historical bibliography&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (sometimes the &amp;quot;biology of books&amp;quot;): studying books as part of a Darwinian evolution of a manufactring process&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;descriptive bibliography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: using info gained in analytical and historical bibliography to prepare an account of the bibiographical nature of the book -- addressing the &amp;quot;ideal copy&amp;quot;, listing contents, format, collation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ideal copy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: that version intended for release by the printer, after all determined corrections have been made&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;textual bibliography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: employment of technical info derived from analytical or descriptive bibliography in charting and evalutating the effect of the technical history on the text itself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
paleography, codicology, analytical and descriptive bibliography as a prelud to the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; business of textual scholarship: &amp;quot;the reconstruction of an author&amp;#039;s intended text and/or the production of a critical edition displaying this intention or some other version of the text&amp;quot; (8); sometimes called &amp;quot;textual criticism&amp;quot; in classics, biblical studies, medieval studies -- sometimes also called &amp;quot;Lower Criticism&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recension&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: arranging manuscripts according to relative authority, using the genealogical system of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;stemmatics&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;textual analysis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: similar process of determining textual descent among printed texts, hcharting error and variance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
next step is emendation, through &amp;#039;&amp;#039;textual&amp;#039;&amp;#039; or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;scholarly editing&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
differentiated sometimes from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;documentary editing&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: editing involving single rather than multiple documents; associated with historical rather than literary editions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;New Scholarship&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: practitioners claim that eclectic or critical editing&amp;#039;s concentration on &amp;quot;final intention&amp;quot; is a chimera; better to describe process rather than product of literary composition; often in debate with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;social textual criticism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, denies priority given to author&amp;#039;s intentions and sees textual creation as a collaborative, social act, but both &amp;#039;&amp;#039;New Scholarship&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;social textual criticism&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is part of the general movement of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;revisionism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
textual scholarship part of larger field of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;philology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, defined under 19c German auspices (Altertumswissenschaft, &amp;quot;the science of ancient times&amp;quot;) as the study of historical perspective, seeing a past culture and trying to re-create its ethos; morphed into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;historical linguistics&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (diachronic methods, as opposed to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;structuralist linguistics&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, synchronic methods)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
even more generally, part of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;historical criticism&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as opposed to close critical analysis&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wtrettien</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>